Jump to content

self antag previous warning - Thecreative8


Recommended Posts

Ban reason: Gibbing (self antag previous warning)
Length of ban: On Appeal
Events leading to the ban: I came upon someone who was crit and had a crowbar lying next to him. I unfortunately listened to the primate part of my brain and attacked him. I now know it was wrong and I am very sorry.
Reason the ban should be removed: This is my first offense (I have only been playing for a relatively short time) and I promise not to break the rules again. I love playing this game and will behave in the future. My brother (Thebetterbutter) also wrote to you (Repo) about this. 

Thank you for considering my appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Game Admin

I mainly set this to a appeal due to the strong nonchalant response I got from you in the Ahelp, you seem to have come to the table much more here.
Don't Round remove people for the funny moving forward.

Appeal accepted - Ban removed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Game Admin

To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process:

  • the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days,
  • the appeal is older than 7 days, or
  • the result of the appeal is obvious.

In some cases, the banning admin may process the appeal. The banning admin cannot process the appeal if:

  • the facts that led to the ban are disputed,
  • the appeal makes a claim that the admin who placed it was biased, or
  • the ban was not within the ban guidelines.

You may contact a head game admin if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration. You can find a full list of staff, including head game admins at the staff directory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...