Jump to content

commander_T4 role banned, having a lecter


Commander_T4

Recommended Posts

length of ban : 3 days

roles banned : HOS,ward,cap

events : i was playing cap i had a laser,disabler and lecter during green, i see someone without a ID, decided to confront and said where is the ID she ran, i used my disabler to stop her and said ID where, she ran again, i used my last option my lecter, critted her and brought to med

reason to be unbanned : i feel like a 3 day ban for having a lecter is unfair as i had not know that you cant have a lecter during green alert i do understand that shooting someone with a lecter is abit much (even though she still ran even when i used a disabler to knock her down)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Game Admin

I've had a review of the aHelp and the the ban and it looks like it was place correctly in line with the rules and our banning policy.
These were the rules I noticed you breached while looking at the details.
Walking in to armory and taking gun due to your access would be abusing command held to higher standard as it appears you just went to get it, just in case, which would be the powergaming breach and then mowing down the id less player would be the command/sec engagement rule.

https://wiki.spacestation14.io/wiki/Server_Rules#Do_not_pre-emptively_rush_for_weapons_and_equipment_[Powergaming]
https://wiki.spacestation14.io/wiki/Server_Rules#Command_&_Security_are_held_to_a_higher_standard
https://wiki.spacestation14.io/wiki/Server_Rules#Command_&_Security_engagement_rules

The captain has a lot of privilege in rounds and can be quite a pivotal role so is held to a higher standard and punished when said standards are not met so we don't have a bunch of capts running around every round mowing down every sus greytide.
Ban is for 3 day which is line with banning policy, looks like 1 day left, ban stays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Game Admin

To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process:

  • the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days,
  • the appeal is older than 7 days, or
  • the result of the appeal is obvious.

In some cases, the banning admin may process the appeal. The banning admin cannot process the appeal if:

  • the facts that led to the ban are disputed,
  • the appeal makes a claim that the admin who placed it was biased, or
  • the ban was not within the ban guidelines.

You may contact a head game admin if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration. You can find a full list of staff, including head game admins at the staff directory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...