Stealth16
-
Posts
668 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
43
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Stealth16
-
-
-
This should have probably not been a 48 hour ban. Accepted.
For future reference, unless your role specifically tells you that you are an antagonist, you are not one and random attacking is not permitted.
-
follow the template
-
17 minutes ago, AlphaBravo21 said:
I've been told to kill myself IRL, burn IRL, have my house bombed IRL, by your players.
You should be reporting this.
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, bruh56 said:
well I definetly acted wrong but its been some time I understand my mistake and I wont do it again
What exactly do you believe your mistake was?
-
2 hours ago, Discobabester14 said:
I now operate under Discobabester14, This is not an attempt to evade my ban, I just forgot my password and username to the original account
No but your attempts to ban evade under the names Discobabester15 and Wildspacecarp were and you will need a voucher to appeal.
-
This feels pretty open and shut. A player had his jumpsuit stolen and instead of helping him get another jumpsuit you sentenced him to brig. That is not good security play.
I dislike how you initially justified the brigging as hooliganism. The user in question claimed to have their clothes stolen. That is hardly hooliganism. Even if you do not believe them, the correct course of action would be to supply them with clothes and, if you're feeling generous, a new PDA. Space Law, as detailed on our wiki, does not apply to our LRP servers. But even if it did, I don't think this was an applicable use of Space Law, as Hooliganism as written applies to "malicious disruption", and being the victim of a robbery is not malicious disruption. On the launcher, the MRP server is marked MRP, which (in my opinion) should infer that the other servers are not MRP- but I do agree with you that this could be made more clear. Regardless this was not a good application of Space Law even if it did apply to the situation, and the ruling is correct. The decision to permanently ban you from security roles makes sense considering that you doubled down on your insistence that punishing a player for being robbed was the correct course of action.
I encourage you to continue playing. You may appeal again in two weeks.
-
Locking this because thread is getting spammed. I will update you when we have reached a conclusion.
-
1
-
1
-
-
This interaction has me no less than furious.
QuoteKVOSH: wait are you a trial atm?
Whisper: Mhm
KVOSH: Do you have the power to smite me?
Whisper: In my own ways
Whisper: I have access to some of the main ones with some effort
KVOSH: in that case, can you add a note against my name
KVOSH: say something a long the lines of top rated captain
KVOSH: also justin lucy is speaking russian only
Whisper: you have a note that says to smite you if you ask for notes
Whisper: :think:
Whisper: I'm sorry little one
KVOSH: i know you cant smite
KVOSH: but you can write notesAt best this is ignorant. At worst this is malicious. FMPOV it looks like you are intentionally going to a trial admin to get a positive note added to your account because you think they would not be able to punish you for it. The rest of the team agrees with this interpretation. Beyond that, considering that you've been told multiple times to stop misusing and spamming ahelp, you are going to sit this out for its full duration, and if you do it again you should expect it to be a permanent ban.
The unanimous opinion of the team is to deny this appeal.
-
27 minutes ago, will201066 said:
you might say well chaplain told you to free roam not attack people and your right but he never said to NOT attack people
How old are you
-
Please make an appeal on that account then.
-
Ban date was July 11, 2022.
You did post this in the correct spot. Thanks!
-
Ban date was January 14, 2022, making today the one year anniversary of your griefing ban! Happy one year!
If you are unbanned will you be playing on Destroyer118 or Destroyer1181
-
1
-
-
You may reappeal in a month.
-
After internal discussion our stance remains that you will need to obtain a voucher to return.
-
Please do not make another new appeal.
-
I really can't help but feel like you misunderstand what the actual issue here is.
Do you think that this is appropriate?
-
1
-
-
why do you keep deleting your appeals
-
You need a voucher due to ban evasion. You can get that from the other english servers on the launcher (Nyanotrasen, or hell, even Mining Station) or a SS13 server. We've also accepted them from Russian servers in the past for bilingual users.
There isn't a discussion here. You ban evaded, you need a voucher. That is our policy. How much hassle it is to obtain that voucher or submit an appeal is not our concern.
-
Hello!
This appeal has been accepted. Please do not do it again.
-
We can revisit this if you successfully appeal your game ban.
-
I have no idea if this is your main account and I’m not going to put in the time to find out.
Due to ban evasion you will need to have a voucher of good behavior from another SS14 or SS13 server to appeal this ban. You may appeal whenever you have acquired that, and please appeal on the account you wish to play on when you are unbanned.
-
So do you think that the Warden was unjustified in killing two people that they knew for a fact were in the armory and attempting to smuggle laser guns without giving you a warning first? Do you think that is an unjustified use of lethals because you did not classify as a “lethal threat” when you had stolen two laser guns (lethal weaponry) from the armory?
-
2 hours ago, KingOrange said:
Ive took 2 lasers without the intent to steal them
Please elaborate on how you stealing two laser guns from the armory is not you intending to steal two laser guns from the armory.
bodaksent - blowing up an AME via injection...twice
in Closed Appeals
Posted
So I’m confused. Did you or did you not blow up the AME?