Jump to content

Stealth16

Trial Admin
  • Posts

    668
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

Posts posted by Stealth16

  1. On 3/4/2024 at 11:28 PM, MiniMelt said:

    What I don't understand is why this would come weeks later with no signs of repeat behavior, with a clear message immediately after regarding the subject of not talking like that.

    Because, well, someone went log diving. Every now and then we comb through messages for things like slurs or sexually charged messages- things that break our zero tolerance rules. There isn't a wider reason or a conspiracy at play. You got caught by a net that we occasionally cast, and you also just so happen to be a player with an extensive history beyond that. This is the least personal ban that you could possibly be hit by.

  2. 17 hours ago, blorbus said:

    this isnt really an appeal its just an explanation if you dont unban me ill send another when im doing good mentally

    Note that we don't just deny permanent ban appeals anymore. We will either accept your appeal, reduce the ban timer, or upgrade your ban to a voucher. There isn't an option in there where we just say "make another appeal in a week". With that in mind, would you like to add anything to your appeal, or just close this so you can come back to it later?

  3. After admin discussion we have elected to remove the ban.

    • It does not appear you were online when you were contacted over the incident.
    • You have already served whatever minimum sentence would have been appropriate for detonating the fuel tank.

    I apologize for the delay on processing this. Please reach out if you are still unable to connect to the servers.

  4. 2 hours ago, LukeTheGreen said:

    They asked me for a fight and I shot them with my beanbag shell shotgun as a warning as it's my bar. They then attacked me with a mop and was trespassing and calling me racist... From there it was me being attacked and using self defence against the characters.

    You attacking first disqualifies you from claiming self defense. It isn’t self defense, you literally shot him.

  5. 2 hours ago, KingOrange said:

    Since i've seen how scientists were dragging around and hitting dead monkeys i could clearly realise that they were about to murder me.

    Ghost roles are not supposed to remember their previous lives.

    • thistbh 1
  6. Just now, Rich0rd said:

    This sort of "unanimous admin consensus", as it's been described, has not been explained.

    Administrators vote on open appeals. Accept, Deny, or Abstain. A unanimous admin consensus means you did not get a single vote in favor of accepting your appeal.

  7. Hey hey hey it's me the berry here with the most important question this channel will ever receive

    When is it appropriate to escalate a non-violent conflict into a violent one?

    Examples:

    • Assistant broke into cap's office, stole an item, refuses to drop it and leave.
    • An atmos technician walks into atmos to find someone in a gas mask with no ID in atmos.
    • A security officer is attempting to unjustifiably arrest a bartender for creating moonshine.
    • A clown hops into botany and uses a spade to remove every single plant.

    Assume that the killing party makes an attempt to get the killed party to medical. Both parties have no way of knowing if the other is an antag or not, and assume that in all cases there are no non-lethal alternatives. Assume as well that none of these people have violated any other rules (besides perhaps "don't be a dick", fuck you clown who removed my corn!)

    All of these are situations that I have personally encountered in my time playing in the last two weeks and for each one I've seen people who believe that the case was either completely against the rules or was completely safe under the current rules.

    The hope is that we can find some kind of generalized rule qualifying when it is appropriate to escalate conflict IC.

  8. On 3/30/2023 at 3:02 PM, EVIL_ED said:

    I just find this rule to be very befuddling and have to ask why it even exists at all. It seems so silly to me. Understanding why it exists is also important because it can help people understand what our real chances are for official severs that could allow for ERP.

    Because most players don't want sex in their funny space game.

    Players who do want sex in their funny space game tend to make their own communities for it. They are the exception, not the norm, but they do exist in large enough numbers to justify creating their own servers.

  9. Hi, banning admin here (I retired a few days ago). I’m going to offer my perspective.

    Aside from breaking the server rules, you made several people uncomfortable, and your actions caused a public riot in security. To say that you were an active detriment during that round is an understatement. To my memory, I did not even bother contacting you because the level of trolling you operated on is usually indicative of an intentional griefer- not a well meaning troll parodying incel groups.

    The rules very clearly define that assholes are not welcome. That really is a catch all. Pretending to be an asshole is still being an asshole, and the administration team should not be expected to have the time or patience to determine who is an asshole and who is just “roleplaying” like one (although I have a hard time calling what you were doing roleplaying)

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
  10. One day prior to your ban you were told the following

    Quote

    CakeMaestor: I'm going to be very honest with you, this is probably going to be a last warning since you already have many notes to your name. I'm giving you a final warning, is what I'm saying. You're on thin ice, please behave.

    And literally, the next day, you proceeded to bomb someone out of frustration.

    How can we know you will not do this again?

  11. Are you aware that some members of the administration team and several members of the project maintainer team are furries, including several people who be will voting on your appeal? People who don’t particularly like that you referred to them banning you as a “hate crime”.

    I know personally we have had discussions about proper naming policies before. That gives me pause when I consider this appeal.

×
×
  • Create New...