Jump to content

Stealth16

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    660

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    42

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Stealth16

    LukeTheGreen - Specism

    in Accepted Appeals

    Posted

    2 hours ago, LukeTheGreen said:

    They asked me for a fight and I shot them with my beanbag shell shotgun as a warning as it's my bar. They then attacked me with a mop and was trespassing and calling me racist... From there it was me being attacked and using self defence against the characters.

    You attacking first disqualifies you from claiming self defense. It isn’t self defense, you literally shot him.

    Waiting for clarification

    in Closed Appeals

    Posted

    2 hours ago, KingOrange said:

    Since i've seen how scientists were dragging around and hitting dead monkeys i could clearly realise that they were about to murder me.

    Ghost roles are not supposed to remember their previous lives.

    • thistbh 1

    Rich0rd - Toxicity (2)

    in Accepted Appeals

    Posted

    Just now, Rich0rd said:

    This sort of "unanimous admin consensus", as it's been described, has not been explained.

    Administrators vote on open appeals. Accept, Deny, or Abstain. A unanimous admin consensus means you did not get a single vote in favor of accepting your appeal.

    Appropriate escalation from non-violence into violence

    in Questions

    Posted · Edited by Stealth16
    edited example 1

    Hey hey hey it's me the berry here with the most important question this channel will ever receive

    When is it appropriate to escalate a non-violent conflict into a violent one?

    Examples:

    • Assistant broke into cap's office, stole an item, refuses to drop it and leave.
    • An atmos technician walks into atmos to find someone in a gas mask with no ID in atmos.
    • A security officer is attempting to unjustifiably arrest a bartender for creating moonshine.
    • A clown hops into botany and uses a spade to remove every single plant.

    Assume that the killing party makes an attempt to get the killed party to medical. Both parties have no way of knowing if the other is an antag or not, and assume that in all cases there are no non-lethal alternatives. Assume as well that none of these people have violated any other rules (besides perhaps "don't be a dick", fuck you clown who removed my corn!)

    All of these are situations that I have personally encountered in my time playing in the last two weeks and for each one I've seen people who believe that the case was either completely against the rules or was completely safe under the current rules.

    The hope is that we can find some kind of generalized rule qualifying when it is appropriate to escalate conflict IC.

    ERP is against the rules... why exactly?

    in General

    Posted

    On 3/30/2023 at 3:02 PM, EVIL_ED said:

    I just find this rule to be very befuddling and have to ask why it even exists at all. It seems so silly to me. Understanding why it exists is also important because it can help people understand what our real chances are for official severs that could allow for ERP.

    Because most players don't want sex in their funny space game.

    Players who do want sex in their funny space game tend to make their own communities for it. They are the exception, not the norm, but they do exist in large enough numbers to justify creating their own servers.

    Silva - Screaming ACAB while being a security guard

    in Closed Appeals

    Posted

    Hi, banning admin here (I retired a few days ago). I’m going to offer my perspective.

    Aside from breaking the server rules, you made several people uncomfortable, and your actions caused a public riot in security. To say that you were an active detriment during that round is an understatement. To my memory, I did not even bother contacting you because the level of trolling you operated on is usually indicative of an intentional griefer- not a well meaning troll parodying incel groups.

    The rules very clearly define that assholes are not welcome. That really is a catch all. Pretending to be an asshole is still being an asshole, and the administration team should not be expected to have the time or patience to determine who is an asshole and who is just “roleplaying” like one (although I have a hard time calling what you were doing roleplaying)

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2

    Ban appeal (self antag welder bombing)

    in Accepted Appeals

    Posted

    One day prior to your ban you were told the following

    Quote

    CakeMaestor: I'm going to be very honest with you, this is probably going to be a last warning since you already have many notes to your name. I'm giving you a final warning, is what I'm saying. You're on thin ice, please behave.

    And literally, the next day, you proceeded to bomb someone out of frustration.

    How can we know you will not do this again?

    lizards, game ban due to unacceptable name "Nuzzles Ur Wuzzles"

    in Closed Appeals

    Posted

    Are you aware that some members of the administration team and several members of the project maintainer team are furries, including several people who be will voting on your appeal? People who don’t particularly like that you referred to them banning you as a “hate crime”.

    I know personally we have had discussions about proper naming policies before. That gives me pause when I consider this appeal.

    why121me, welderbombing as non antag

    in Closed Appeals

    Posted

    appeal denied due to attempted ban evasion as recently as 15 minutes prior to making this appeal

    you may appeal again no sooner than 6 months after your most recent attempt at ban evasion (currently august 26, 2023) with a voucher of good behavior from another SS13/SS14 server

×
×
  • Create New...