-
Posts
664 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
42
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Stealth16
-
https://www.lovetoknow.com/food-drink/cocktails/antifreeze-drink It’s not people literally drinking antifreeze. It’s the name of the drink.
-
god i love leviathan
-
ban beacuse of anger/ trying to fix a problem witha mix of power outage
Stealth16 replied to Toa47's topic in Closed Appeals
I have no idea what you’re talking about. -
You attacking first disqualifies you from claiming self defense. It isn’t self defense, you literally shot him.
-
Ghost roles are not supposed to remember their previous lives.
-
Administrators vote on open appeals. Accept, Deny, or Abstain. A unanimous admin consensus means you did not get a single vote in favor of accepting your appeal.
-
Will the 80 player max on Lizard's Den be permanent or not?
Stealth16 replied to Quartermaster's topic in General
Miros is actually the best wizards den server in terms of hardware. The only times I’ve ever lagged there were when an admin fucked something up. The latency does not noticeably change gameplay. -
Hey hey hey it's me the berry here with the most important question this channel will ever receive When is it appropriate to escalate a non-violent conflict into a violent one? Examples: Assistant broke into cap's office, stole an item, refuses to drop it and leave. An atmos technician walks into atmos to find someone in a gas mask with no ID in atmos. A security officer is attempting to unjustifiably arrest a bartender for creating moonshine. A clown hops into botany and uses a spade to remove every single plant. Assume that the killing party makes an attempt to get the killed party to medical. Both parties have no way of knowing if the other is an antag or not, and assume that in all cases there are no non-lethal alternatives. Assume as well that none of these people have violated any other rules (besides perhaps "don't be a dick", fuck you clown who removed my corn!) All of these are situations that I have personally encountered in my time playing in the last two weeks and for each one I've seen people who believe that the case was either completely against the rules or was completely safe under the current rules. The hope is that we can find some kind of generalized rule qualifying when it is appropriate to escalate conflict IC.
-
Because most players don't want sex in their funny space game. Players who do want sex in their funny space game tend to make their own communities for it. They are the exception, not the norm, but they do exist in large enough numbers to justify creating their own servers.
-
Silva - Screaming ACAB while being a security guard
Stealth16 replied to Silva's topic in Closed Appeals
Hi, banning admin here (I retired a few days ago). I’m going to offer my perspective. Aside from breaking the server rules, you made several people uncomfortable, and your actions caused a public riot in security. To say that you were an active detriment during that round is an understatement. To my memory, I did not even bother contacting you because the level of trolling you operated on is usually indicative of an intentional griefer- not a well meaning troll parodying incel groups. The rules very clearly define that assholes are not welcome. That really is a catch all. Pretending to be an asshole is still being an asshole, and the administration team should not be expected to have the time or patience to determine who is an asshole and who is just “roleplaying” like one (although I have a hard time calling what you were doing roleplaying) -
Ranbee - Huge asshole, menace, ERP maniac
Stealth16 replied to mistersister123's topic in Closed Appeals
Please sign in with and appeal using the account you were banned on. -
JustAnOrange, Banned For QM Shittery- Selling the nuke.
Stealth16 replied to JustAnOrange's topic in Closed Appeals
Go ahead and make another appeal following the format template. -
Closing this. You may reappeal if you have a voucher.
-
Ban date was the 26th of December.
-
Would you be able to get a voucher from an SS13 server, then?
-
One day prior to your ban you were told the following And literally, the next day, you proceeded to bomb someone out of frustration. How can we know you will not do this again?
-
lizards, game ban due to unacceptable name "Nuzzles Ur Wuzzles"
Stealth16 replied to lizards's topic in Closed Appeals
Are you aware that some members of the administration team and several members of the project maintainer team are furries, including several people who be will voting on your appeal? People who don’t particularly like that you referred to them banning you as a “hate crime”. I know personally we have had discussions about proper naming policies before. That gives me pause when I consider this appeal. -
appeal denied due to attempted ban evasion as recently as 15 minutes prior to making this appeal you may appeal again no sooner than 6 months after your most recent attempt at ban evasion (currently august 26, 2023) with a voucher of good behavior from another SS13/SS14 server