Jump to content

Skarlet

Project Manager
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Skarlet

  1. Sorry for the extended delay, the moderation team has decided to reject this appeal. You may reappeal two weeks from now.
  2. Sorry for the extended delay, the moderation team has decided to reject this appeal. You may reappeal two weeks from now.
  3. This is the message that got you banned.
  4. Non-antag crew can generally loot bodies as long as they do not steal syndicate objectives off of people, eg. captain's lasergun, captain's spare ID, QM's digiboard, and so forth. However, there comes a problem when non-antags start stealing PDAs or IDs off of bodies. Not only does stealing those remove the owner's ability to access their department as well as the rest of the station, but the non-antag thief might also deprive the owner of their Uplink, should they have one. Therefore, non-antag crew shouldn't steal PDAs/IDs off of people unless it is absolutely necessary, such as during emergencies. An example of what when it would be appropriate to take a PDA/ID off of someone as a non-antag would be to drag the owner's corpse out of a locked area, should they be trapped inside. The owner of the PDA/ID should be given their PDA/ID back after the emergency. None of this applies to catatonic players as we do not count those as players.
  5. Would you mind giving us additional context as to what your behavior is when playing this character so that we may provide a proper response?
  6. All crew on MRP are expected to stay within their job and not do other people's jobs for them, however there are no restrictions on crew knowledge in regards to hacking doors. This applies whether or not the situation is an emergency.
  7. To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process: the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days, the appeal is older than 7 days, or the result of the appeal is obvious. In some cases, the banning admin may process the appeal. The banning admin cannot process the appeal if: the facts that led to the ban are disputed, the appeal makes a claim that the admin who placed it was biased, or the ban was not within the ban guidelines. You may contact a head game admin if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration. You can find a full list of staff, including head game admins at the staff directory.
  8. After reviewing the round, I've decided to deny this appeal. While the Riot Participation accusation is unsubstantiated, making yourself a pain to deal with for security is self-antagging, and for this reason, the ban is within guidelines. Please remember that every other player in the round is trying to enjoy the game, not just you. Keep this in mind when interacting with crew and security as a non-antag.
  9. These are examples of information that do not suggest a revolution: • A crewmember was caught carrying a flash and a pair of sunglasses. • Hearing a flash being used. Flash usage or possession does not immediately indicate subversive behavior. While these actions may draw suspicion to a regular crewmember, it is at most possession of restricted gear stolen from the security department. The flash may be confiscated should the crew member have no justifiable reason for possession, such as borg construction. These are examples of evidence that can be used to suspect a revolution: • Witnessing or hearing a report of revolutionary conversion (getting flashed and falling over for a few seconds). • A department head getting targeted, either assault or the head's death. A report of conversion from a reliable source (security or command) is sufficient grounds for security to suspect a revolution, and begin preparations to confirm the threat, such as ordering mindshields and attempting to mindshield suspects. Crew attempting to subvert command/security may be mindshielded. These are examples of evidence that can be used to identify and/or confirm a revolution: • Deconverting a revolutionary using a mindshield implant. The successful deconversion of a suspected revolutionary is irrefutable evidence that both confirms the presence of subversive elements on the station and allows security to neutralize the threat, such as mass mindshielding and allowing crew to attain flash resistant gear. It is important to note that Security is free to execute confirmed (through mindshielding) Head Revolutionaries as they see fit.
  10. While searching through logs I found an instance of you using the term 'retard' 3 days after your last ban for it expired. This would normally have resulted in an indefinite ban due to your history with slur use, so it's something you should also try to address for this appeal to be successful. Feel free to do that in a reply here.
  11. Considering this ban is not within guidelines, I have decided to accept this appeal. Please keep in mind that while mistakes happen, we still do not allow the use of other languages on our servers. This applies to both IC chat and OOC. As for round removing your targets or your colleague's targets as an antag, I see no issue in doing so within reason. I don't know if your last ban was while you were offline, so just to make sure you didn't miss it, please make sure you're not doing things like antag rolling, suiciding roundstart, or using info from death.
  12. The admin gave you a heads-up right at the start to drop the topic, yet you kept bringing it up despite the warnings. Here is the related ahelp. Considering the ban has been over for a long time, I will be closing this appeal. Please be mindful of other players when interacting with them in game.
  13. After review, I've concluded the points you raised were true, and this ban will not count against you.
  14. To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process: the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days, the appeal is older than 7 days, or the result of the appeal is obvious. In some cases, the banning admin may process the appeal. The banning admin cannot process the appeal if: the facts that led to the ban are disputed, the appeal makes a claim that the admin who placed it was biased, or the ban was not within the ban guidelines. You may contact a head game admin if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration. You can find a full list of staff, including head game admins at the staff directory.
  15. After reviewing the round, I've decided to deny this appeal. You escalated the situation rather quickly in the boxing ring, hitting the security officer with a crowbar. From what I could gather and from your explanation, they took some clothes/gloves from the boxing ring (they were actively using the gloves to box in the ring) and you told them to put them back. They walked out of the ring after being asked to, but didn't run off with the equipment; rather staying in the audience and hanging out. You then press the matter, and after being ignored, you crowbar them a bunch, making them pull out their pistol and shoot you with rubber rounds. Pun-Pun decides to down you for some reason, and so you are taken to med. You end up focusing really hard on the fact that they stole from you and end up attempting to get 'justice served' by hanging at security's door and staring into their souls a few times during the round. From what I saw, there were multiple exchanges between you and the security player that round where you keep yelling that they stole from you, instead of attempting to get help from another officer. Ensues a few more exchanges where one of you steals from the other, ultimately ending up with you kidnapping the officer, them asking bystanders to call security, and them getting their cuffs off, critting you and leaving you dead in a bin. As for the name, you have been contacted four times already by our admins concerning your character names, all of which were within the span of two months. I trust you will be more careful in the future, and we'll be glad to have you back once your short ban is over.
  16. For the record, breaking into armory as a non-antag is a big no-no and should be avoided, and generally you want to avoid walking into high-risk areas as a non-antag, even for gags. Giving yourself AA is also not really something you should do, as it creates problems for command and security, even if others are doing it. Considering you weren't a part of a revolution, I'll be accepting this appeal.
  17. This username is not logged onto our servers and has no active bans. Are you appealing a wizard's den ban and using the right account?
  18. The admin team has decided to accept the appeal, reducing it to a one week game ban as well as an appeal-only command role ban. You may appeal the role ban separately.
  19. After reviewing the round, here are the discrepenties I could find: A security officers approaches you about wanting to check in on the Captain and HoP, in the bridge. You ask on radio if they are both alive, and you follow the officer to the bridge. Inside, you find the HoS, Captain and HoP; The HoS is attempting to non-lethally arrest the Captain, to which the Captain responds to by running away. The HoS gets stamcrit, and you hit him with your guitar. The HoP attempts to stop the officer from arresting the HoS, and you follow sec as the Captain shoots at officers with his laser, who were non-lethally arresting him. You once again, hit the officers with your guitar, twice this time. Captain gets away and HoS resorts to lethals against him, which the Captain responds to by critting him with his laser. You follow the HoS into medical as he gets revived. Not 5 minutes have passed since you have left medical and you tell the Captain, who came to cargo, that sec is rebelling and that you need to declare independence. You order weapons, saying 'Long live cargo' After a bunch of shooting in security, you walk into the armory to aid the 'warden' (a service worker), and shoot at a security officer, who is being overrun by cargo staff, accidentally downing one of your salvagers. In the medical bay, you drop from lack of food; the warden cuffs you in crit and gets you medical aid. You ask the paramedic to 'Shoot him' because 'He is with HoS', to which the paramedic answers by downing the warden. Would you like to provide any additional comments on this matter?
  20. I will be closing this for now, please send an admin message if you have more questions, and please make a new appeal when you have acquired a voucher.
  21. The admin team has decided to reject this appeal, you can submit another appeal in 2 weeks time.
  22. 'A voucher of good behavior should be obtained from a well-known or decently active SS13/SS14 server' doesn't mean it needs to be an english server. You can get a voucher from a well-known or decently active russian server.
×
×
  • Create New...