Jump to content

Chief_Engineer

Project Manager
  • Posts

    973
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    56

Everything posted by Chief_Engineer

  1. These are the relevant ahelps I was able to find, am I missing any? The first is yours, the second is the one someone posted on your ban appeal
  2. Is their anything in particular you feel was unjust about the way you were treated, or is it just that a ban was applied? When you say you want to try to get the rules adjusted, what exactly do you mean by that, what sort of adjustment are you hoping would be made?
  3. I know you were directed to staff complaints, but just to clarify, is this a staff complaint or are you just looking for clarification on the name use/rules?
  4. I've received 1 more DM within the same thread and shared it with project managers
  5. I've received 2 more DMs within the same thread and shared them with project managers
  6. I've received a DM and shared it with project managers
  7. If you have any evidence that you are being targeted, other than the fact that you were banned, or if you have anything else that you'd like to share privately, please send it to me through a forum DM within the next 24 hours and make a post on this appeal indicating that you have sent me a DM. If you need more than 24 hours to be able to collect or provide this information, please make a post on this thread within 24 hours indicating that you intend to send a DM, but that you'll need more than 24 hours.
  8. If you have any evidence that you are being targeted, other than the fact that you were banned, or if you have anything else that you'd like to share privately, please send it to me through a forum DM within the next 24 hours and make a post on this appeal indicating that you have sent me a DM. If you need more than 24 hours to be able to collect or provide this information, please make a post on this thread within 24 hours indicating that you intend to send a DM, but that you'll need more than 24 hours.
  9. I was beaten to closing the appeal, but I did fix your notes to make it clear the ban shouldn't be considered against you
  10. Your ban has been lifted, I'll close the appeal once I update your notes with one saying the ban was for the wrong player
  11. Due to your attempt to evade your ban, you are banned indefinitely. You may appeal your ban, but only at least 6 months after your last ban evasion attempt, and only with a voucher of good behavior from another SS13/SS14 server. A voucher of good behavior should be obtained from a well-known or decently active SS13/SS14 server. If it is a mainstream server, we recommend using that server's admin-help to ask for a voucher from one of the administrators explaining that you are trying to appeal a ban on SS14's Wizard's Den and want to show you have been a problem-free player during your playtime on the server. A voucher should be indicative of at least a few months of play. If the voucher is not from a mainstream server, let us know and we will figure out a way to verify it.
  12. Yes, it's an evasion attempt, and yes the date repo gave is correct. You also had a short ban in February and in January.
  13. The admin team has decided to accept this appeal, you should be able to connect to the servers now
  14. Here is a copy of the ahelp from Lizard 38077 **spaceylady:** Are you the warden? **Changeling:** yes I am the warden **spaceylady:** Okay so just a reminder that security and command are hold to a higher standard of roleplay and that includes not leaving dead bodies and prisoners around security. **Changeling:** can you be more specific as to which names you have an issue with **Changeling:** the catatonic body that I am in process of searching **Changeling:** or the perma prisoner that asked to be permad, and then proceeded to destroy perma? **spaceylady:** I don't know if you are aware but people with purple text are considered dead and therefore you should be morging them or taking them to medical. **Changeling:** I am aware that catatonic people are not inhabited by players and are free game to anyone, I was also in process of stripping their syndicate gear, is there a specific issue you have with my actions? **spaceylady:** I'm just reminding you that as warden it is your responsibility to prevent them from dying in custody and if they do die you should be morging them and not just leaving them to rot. **spaceylady:** Rule 20 and 21 state this **Changeling:** can you tell me who specifically was I supposed to prevent from dying? **Changeling:** I am not in control of who decides to /ghost their character, so please I ask you again to state the full name of who I let die or otherwise neglected **spaceylady:** I cannot give you information about the current round but I have been spectating and noticed it has been a significant issue. **Changeling:** then please do tell me the exact issue that you have noticed **spaceylady:** I have already explained. The issue regards rule 20 and 21 where you should be protecting detainees and people in custody and that includes not leaving dead people to rot. **Changeling:** can you tell me who I have not protected or left to rot? **Changeling:** can you even point at a single example in this round is what I am asking, because you have not given me a single name or situation to defend myself from so I cant argue with you about generic rules **spaceylady:** As I have just said I cannot give you information about the current round and I am just reminding you of these rules and the roleplay that is expected of command and security. **Changeling:** alright I see this is not going anywhere and you have no intention of actually telling me what I did wrong **spaceylady:** I have already said a couple of times that I am just reminding you of those rules and the fact you must not leave dead people to rot. Including those who are catatonic. **Changeling:** do you consider catatonic corpses to be players? **spaceylady:** When someone is catatonic they have taken another ghost role so no. **Changeling:** then why do you keep mentioning catatonic corpses rotting **spaceylady:** I was just asking you to engage in some RP behavior. LRP is not NRP, have a good rest of the round.
  15. The admin team has decided to accept this appeal. Please make sure you're familiar with our server rules before the next time you play
  16. The admin team has decided to accept this appeal. Please make sure you're familiar with our server rules before the next time you play
  17. This appeal is being closed due to inactivity. Feel free to open another appeal whenever you'd like that addresses the ban reason presented above
  18. This appeal is being closed due to inactivity. Feel free to open another appeal whenever you'd like that addresses the ban reason presented above
  19. This ban comes shortly after your accepted appeal for an earlier ban for the use of slurs, ERP, and remembering a past life Like that ban, this ban also included ERP issues, combined with multiple other issues. Based on this, the admin team has decided to reject this appeal and apply a voucher ban. You may still appeal your ban, but only at least 6 months after the date of your ban, and only with a voucher of good behavior from another SS13/SS14 server. A voucher of good behavior should be obtained from a well-known or decently active SS13/SS14 server. If it is a mainstream server, we recommend using that server's admin-help to ask for a voucher from one of the administrators explaining that you are trying to appeal a ban on SS14's Wizard's Den and want to show you have been a problem-free player during your playtime on the server. A voucher should be indicative of at least a few months of play. If the voucher is not from a mainstream server, let us know and we will figure out a way to verify it.
  20. The admin team has decided to accept this appeal. You should now be able to connect to the servers.
  21. The admin team has decided to not accept this appeal. While what you did wasn't ERP, it does violate the rule which says In addition to other issues, there appear to be multiple instances where you've been warned for sexual content in the past. Depending on context, references to hitler are generally also considered an issue, though the primary reason for rejecting this appeal appears to be due to your history of issues with sexual content and in general. You can appeal again no sooner than 2 weeks from now
  22. Unfortunately there is no exception for the voucher requirement. We don't require you to be active on other server's forums, only that another well-known or decently active SS13/SS14 server be willing to say that you've spent a few months playing on the server without any major issues. You're free to open another appeal, but only with a voucher
  23. This is asking what policy or expectation the admin who you are making a complaint about violated. To make sure I'm understanding what exactly you believe is the issue, is your complaint: that you were asked to change your name, which you believe is appropriate, that one of the reasons you were given for having to change your name, "you could be mistaken for an admin with that name since we choose goofy names sometimes", was not a valid reason, both of the above, or some other issue.
  24. The round was Lizard 37820. Here is the complete text of the ahelp from that round: There are 2 ahelping in what appear to be the next 2 rounds where the complainant is informed that they haven't changed their name, but these do not appear to be relevant to the complaint. There is another ahelp on what appears to be the round after those two where the complainant asks if a specific name would be appropriate, but that also appears to not be relevant to the complaint. Any or all of these ahelps will be shared at request of the complainant.
  25. The admin team has decided to accept this appeal. Your role ban has been lifted
×
×
  • Create New...