Leaderboard

SS14 account username: gunker123 Ban reason: not the correct age to play Date of ban: 3/3/23 Events leading to the ban: I was wrongfully jailed in game, i told them repeatedly but they wouldnt listen, i was than banned after joking to an admin that i was one year older than he inferred that I was. Reason the ban should be removed: This admin with the world "Engineer" in his name, I can't remember it completely, fully and blantantly abused his power to ban people. I made a joke which i thought was aloud, instead I am punished for it. He did not take any action to accumulate information on if I were serious or not about my age, he also implied that I was actually 13, meaning he assumed I was, and would have been okay with it if I hadn't even mentioned it. This is a power thirsty admin who in the eyes of the people, is not for the people, but for himself and full control over the people.

Hi, banning admin here (I retired a few days ago). I’m going to offer my perspective. Aside from breaking the server rules, you made several people uncomfortable, and your actions caused a public riot in security. To say that you were an active detriment during that round is an understatement. To my memory, I did not even bother contacting you because the level of trolling you operated on is usually indicative of an intentional griefer- not a well meaning troll parodying incel groups. The rules very clearly define that assholes are not welcome. That really is a catch all. Pretending to be an asshole is still being an asshole, and the administration team should not be expected to have the time or patience to determine who is an asshole and who is just “roleplaying” like one (although I have a hard time calling what you were doing roleplaying)

The admin team takes metacomming very seriously as it can have a significant negative impact on the game for other players. While you're certainly free to log off when you see people playing who you don't want to play in a round with, please also ahelp in the future if your suspicions are based on something. While it may be tempting to think that someone else may report or catch it, unfortunately many people share that idea which can result in things being missed. I think a lot of people avoid ahelping things because they don't want to waste admin time with duplicate reports or reporting someone who might be an antag. It is very easy for admins to do things like handle duplicate reports or check antag status. Personally I'd rather get 10 reports of the same thing than have to rely on seeing it myself, and checking antag status takes seconds. If you're interested, you can read more about when to ahelp and what information is most useful to include at https://wiki.spacestation14.io/wiki/Ahelp. If you're ever in doubt, feel free to ahelp and feel free to ask if you should ahelp similar situations in the future.

Maybe lone not but i wont lie or omit things to better present my case. I did ban evade (with justification) and I truly believe that Jschip is a massive snitch. I also truely believe this ban discord was kangaroo court in the first place.

If you can edit your original post, do that. If not, just add it on to here and we'll go from there. That being said we do not need your input on how long you think you should be banned for. You can take a break from Wizard's Den for a bit after telling us "shittery is fun" while trying to sell station-critical objects as a head of staff. You may submit an appeal if you would like.

Hi. We specifically rule against killing AFK players for the very scenario which occurred, where AFK players come back to the game and are rightfully upset they have been murdered for no reason. Perceived rule-breaking by other players does not enable you to do the same. Furthermore I do not appreciate you insulting our staff for enforcing rules that you appear to have little regard for. Volunteer administrative staff are not your verbal punching bags. This appeal will have the opposite effect and your ban is upgraded to appeal-only. You may appeal this ban in no less than two weeks from now (April 11th, 2023).

policy my nuts

Regardless of what you might think about Karl Marx and his ideologies, I believe he framed it well when he said: "Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary." In this case, my arms were a botany scythe that I used to cut wheat from hydroponic pools and authoritarian heads from authoritarian bodies. (Attempted to separate authoritarian heads from authoritarian bodies. The authoritarians won...) What did lead me to believe castle doctrine was in effect? As a botanist, Nanotrasen specially put me in charge of defending and honoring the tools of the craft, as well as the fruits of the hydroponics system; from all threats. Both foreign and domestic. Security's job is to protect the people of the station, and while that does include protecting the people from the people, that was not the context that this situation took place in. They were bullies who had a need to impose their will on others and when others fight back, security cripples the supply of food to the station. All this is under the pretense of course, that this is a silly video game that in this instance, got taken too far. I've had a blast teaming up with security guys to beat the shit out of spiders and meat monsters, and whenever I play medical I only drug the clowns, instead of security. Thank you for the response Chief_Engineer.

What led you to believe there is any castle doctrine in Space Station 14 or on Wizard's Den servers? Additionally, were castle doctrine to be in effect, why would that empower employees (botanists) of the property owner (Nanotrasen) to use lethal force against other employees (security) who are performing tasks (search/seizure?) related to their employment?

Okay but how the fuck do we moderate it. (We're not adding voice support and even if someone not us comes in and codes it, we're not running it on official servers.)

That is true. I made that account to talk to my friends on the discord because it was an unjust ban in the first place caused by someone white knighting and getting offended on the behalf of my nationality. This ban was clearly and obviously goofy and unjust in the first place and skirting it to talk to my friends on the ss14 discord is a victimless crime. Things like this are why ppl meme about discord moderators. Also ur a snitch Jschip.

Not only is your blatant lie so easy to see through it may as well be transparent, you've been attempting to evade your ban on multiple different accounts and are only making this appeal because you couldn't evade your ban. We are not interested in having racists who ban evade and then lie in an appeal play on our servers. This ban is not appealable.

We have a strict policy on ban evasion. Due to your attempt at evasion, this 2 day ban is now a voucher ban. You can appeal your ban no sooner than 6 months from your last attempt at ban evasion. Additionally you must have a voucher of good behavior from another SS13 or SS14 server.

To prevent abuse, please post a reply containing only the text from the following image:

Voice chat has been suggested before, and has never been added for two main reasons. 1. Microphones. You can't guarantee everyone has, or has the same quality microphone. So, while someone might have perfect quality and audio levels, someone else has an Xbox 360 microphone and blows out your eardrums. 2. Identity. There exists in the game an 'identity' system, which mechanically disguises you if you remove identifying qualities or items, like an ID or concealing your face. If you speak normally, it will say something like "Urist McHands says:". If you use a voice changer item, it'll say "Real McPerson says:". Having voice chat completely breaks this, as unless you are a professional voice actor, you will never be able to actually fool anyone. At best, people will have to pretend they think you're a different person. At worst, you'll just get killed on the spot by certain kinds of people (read: bad players).

I would like you to find SpaceAsshole please and thank you

You seem to have a firm understanding of why this was an issue. This was principally an appeal ban since you could not be contacted at the time of offense. The arrivals station and area is off-limits to both antagonists and normal players as far as disruptive activity goes as this essentially takes players out of the round before they have an opportunity to do anything. This ban will be lifted.

SS14 account username: Kamilw Ban reason: Grief as hamlet Date of ban: 27/03/23 Length of ban: Removed via appeal Events leading to the ban: Played as hamlet one late evening, decided to smash a glass table and water cooler in bridge out of bordem. Captain gets fed up with my antics and calls a KOS on me, so I bite their pet inside their quarters. Reason the ban should be removed: I honestly thought that pets such as hamlet get more leniency in what they do since they are wild animals and he does not have a specific "owner", I think that although I did grief part of the bridge, its still within realism for a wild animal to do that. I didn't bite any actual person and just hid when someone wanted to grab me. AFAIK Renault isn't tied to a syndicate objective or anything like that like with Ian which I wouldn't bite because thats self-antaging and the only person who would have even noticed would be the captain. I don't have any recent bans or warns leading up to this for I think around one year, so I don't think its fair to say that this is repetitive behaviour like the admin assumed calling me a "shitter that wont improve". I wont get let down over whether this gets accepted or not, but I think it will be a shame to keep the ban permanent over something that likely didn't upset the captain and didn't directly harm/ruin the experience for any player.

never mind got banned from nyanotransen for ERP I give up

Administrator consensus is to accept your appeal. You will be able to play again. Please do not engage in metacommunications in the future.

so am guessing new appeal in month

Administrator consensus is to accept your appeal. In it's place, we will be enacting a warden and HoS roleban which is appeal-only. If you wish, you may submit a new appeal for the roleban in two (2) weeks. Do note that any attempts to place yourself in the two positions mentioned will count as ban evasion and will be dealt with a game ban. I

I'd also like to chip in your rather problematic behavior in the discord where you continue (even after warning) talking about coding in something to the effect of "putin c4 in peoples ass for fun and kill the cap" like "seths vid on ss13 lol".

I had RCD'd the doors because I thought it was funny, evidently it wasn't and I was going to dismantle them right after. That is what I wanted to explain to the admin, before I could however I was teleported into the middle of a bunch of sec officers and had a big red KILL sign placed above me. I was then killed and banned from CE

You're welcome. I've started the discussion with the admin team, and I'll try to get a result back to you soon enough to have an impact on the ban. Feel free to to ask any questions about gameplay mechanics in the #help channel of our discord. Also feel free to ask for clarification on any rules via ahelp in-game. We have a more detailed version of our rules available at https://wiki.spacestation14.io/wiki/Server_Rules that may be able to provide clarification for you on things you're unsure of.

" it appears your testimony was somewhat misguided." I dont understand this process or why your answer to my appeal is to tell me how I shouldn't feel the way I do full stop. Please someone tell me what I need to do that's an actual resolution to this, and not whatever this is.

Here is the log of you taking the sunglasses off the dead security officer:

Hello there. After extensive diving through our logs, it appears your testimony was somewhat misguided. The timeline of events show that: The warden tries to pull you, probably away from fuel tank You welderbomb You enters crit A secoff starts dragging you, probably either to medbay or the brig You dies during that You are killsign smited 30 sec later the secoff stops dragging you A musician starts dragging you A scientist starts dragging you You got gibbed The banning administrator pickup your brain and 10 seconds later throw it into perma, then rename it I fail to see how the banning administrator supposedly 'shamed you', when most of it was handled IC. He did not reveal any personal information including your ss14 username or the like, and just used a smite tool at most.

The admin team has decided to accept your appeal. You should now be able to play on Wizard's Den servers.

Administrator consensus is to accept your appeal. Do be noted that under our banning policy, the next ban would be a voucher ban with a minimum waiting time of six (6) months.

This was nearly two months ago. I apologized and I mean it sincerely. The "commenting admin" is unhelpful and has been consistently patronizing in this process, even given that he is the reporting admin on this ban and my other bans. The prisoner never get got close to getting out, nothing but a floor tile even broke. The situation wasn't even allowed to play out and resolve itself either' after I was dead in security custody, very meta public admin action was taken following, publicly OOC shaming me through the hallways and then parading me to perma, keeping me in perma without ban for the remainder of the shift and then banning me at the beginning of the following shift. That was absolutely 100% fair as I did a "big no-no" but it seems a little mean spirited to add a punishment hat on top of another punishment's hat. Welderbombing is wrong.

A letter from station Barratry Parody of: A letter from camp Granada by Allan Sherman Hello Muddah, hello Faddah Here I am at station Barratry Station is very entertaining And they say we'll have some fun if it stops meteor showering. I went to hydroponics with the captain They developed red cap mushrooms You remember the dear captain He got amotixin poisoning last night after dinner All the chefs hate the botanists And the maint has rat invaders And the HOS wants no sissies So he reads to us from Machiavelli Now I don't want this should scare ya' But my crewmate is a syndicate You remember salvage party They're about to organize a searching party Take me home, oh Muddah, Faddah Take me home, I hate Barratry Don't leave me out in space where I might get eaten by a bear Take me home, I promise I will Not make noise, or mess the station with Other boys, oh please don't make me stay I've been here one whole hour Dearest Fadduh, Darling Muddah How's my precious little bruddah Let me come home if you miss me I would even let Morty hug and kiss me Wait a minute, it's stopped exploding Guys are drinking, guys are eating Playing ragecage, gee that's bettah Muddah, Faddah kindly disregard this letter

Hello there. Prior to this ban, you've accumulated several notes and bans which all share a similar reason. These are: 06/01/2023 - Mass vandalism 07/01/2023 - Killing your own rat king as a servant. 3 Day Game Ban. 11/01/2023 - Mass vandalism and RDM. In an AHELP relay an administrator you cited 'enjoyment' as a reason for your actions, and acted oblivious to rules saying 'what rules' & 'this isn't a word'. You were also asked to read the rules by the admin. 17/01/2023 - RDM as a non-antag. 1 Day Game Ban 30/01/2023 - You, as a captain, seeing that a random corpse was being beat up by a player named 'I See Beavers' with a fireaxe, proceeded to join in and beat the corpse leading it to be gibbed. Simply put, I have a few questions to ask: 1) May we know, to your recollection, a full outline of events that led to the gibbing? 2) In an AHELP relay, you mentioned citing believing the downed player 'killing the wardens dog' and 'spiders' as justification to gibbing it. What led you to believe this happened, and why didn't you call security or bring the corpse to medical for inquiry? 3) You have a prolific history of RDM. How would we know this would not happen again?

thanks for taking the time to throw a "well actually" instead of helping.

Out of character, what led you to believe that attacking security with a scythe in this instance was permitted by Wizard's Den's escalation rules?

I'm not an admin but use the template

This application will be denied at this time.

Doing algebra ! Strong body strong mind!!!

I totally second this and want all of it in!! Go swole!!

SS14 account username: Gatute Role(s): Can't remember, think i was an engineer Ban reason: Racial slur at prayers Date of ban: Abour a month ago Length of ban: Indefinite, appeal only Events leading to the ban: I was messing around when i was relatively new to the game and still didn't know how things worked and i thought it'd be funny if i said the n word at prayers (big mistake) Reason the ban should be removed: I didn't know at the time that prayers could actually be heard by someone, i thought that it was just there for flavor and did not mean to offend anyone.

commenting because i was the one to Ahelp this. we tried to get you to not sell them multiple times. you left your duties as QM completely to start a mutiny to sell nuke and disk and even got HoP to play along a bit too. Also here is the format for posting a ban appeal that will help with admins looking at it. = For game bans = SS14 account username: [Your username or account ID] Ban reason: [Reason for ban, visible when attempting to join the server] Date of ban: [Date of ban] Length of ban: [How long the ban is for] Events leading to the ban: [Provide a clear and concise explanation of the events leading up to the ban, including any relevant conversations or factors that may have influenced your actions] Reason the ban should be removed: [Explain why you feel the ban should be removed, either that the ban was inappropriate or that you no longer need to be banned to prevent issues] = For role/job bans = SS14 account username: [Your username or account ID] Role(s): [List of the roles you are appealing a ban for] Date of ban: [Date of ban] Length of ban: [How long the ban is for] Events leading to the ban: [Provide a clear and concise explanation of the events leading up to the ban, including any relevant conversations or factors that may have influenced your actions] Reason the ban should be removed: [Explain why you feel the ban should be removed, either that the ban was inappropriate or that you no longer need to be banned to prevent issues]

I think a really cool role would be some sort of wandering food truck/vendor they could have a cart they pull around like the janicart and it could store food (and people maybe?)

don't bother appealing

A: Proposal I propose that Judge be added as a new Job position to Space Station 14. B: Goal of Proposal The reason for this proposed new Job position is to codify Space Law into a functional Body of Law for Space Station 14. C: Reasoning Behind Proposal Oftentimes Space Law seems like a fleeting suggestion more than a real Body of Law. I think the reason for this is that Space Law lacks the infrastructure necessary to function properly. After having read the entirety of Space Law, Standard Operating Procedure, and Alert Procedure I have come to the conclusion that the reason for this is that Space Law is not really anybody’s actual Job. The closest Job responsible for Space Law is Lawyer. However, this is not proper for any Court of Law. The real Job responsibilities of a Lawyer should actually be arguing for either Prosecution or Defense. Yet, this arguing rarely actually happens as almost nothing ever goes to Trial because Security takes over everything. Space Law clearly delineates a line between High Crimes and Low Crimes. Low Crimes are clearly under the Jurisdiction of Security. However, High Crimes are clearly under the Jurisdiction of Trial Law. That said, in what is often times a lack of a functional Trial System; these High Crimes more likely than not fall to Security as well instead of actually going to Trial. This is because organizing an actual Trial is next to impossible. The reason for this is because Under Space Law, how it is currently written, it’s not really anybody’s actual Job to be in charge of Space Law. Technically speaking, Space Law falls to a Trial with the relevant Department Head or the Captain presiding as a sort of temporary, makeshift Judge. The problem with this structure is that this pins being a Judge onto the Captain and Department Heads as an ancillary responsibility rather than as a real responsibility as a designated Job; and they often times treat it as such. After all, who cam blame them? The Captain’s actual job is to be the head of the entire Station. Because of this, the Captain’s responsibilities are to coordinate Department Heads. This is a full time job. The Captain doesn’t really have the time to ‘play Judge’ very often. Likewise, the Department Head’s actual job is to be the head of the entire department. Because of this, the Department Head’s responsibilities are to coordinate crew. This is a full time job. The Department Heads don’t really have the time to ‘play Judge’ very often. Because the Captain and the Department Heads already have their actual jobs on their plates as positions of full time responsibility; rarely does anybody qualified actually step up to the plate to ‘play Judge.’ I once saw a Court Room pick some random person out of the hallway and shove a Judge Robe on him and call him a Judge just so that a Trial could actually happen. As one could imagine; this resulted in a kangaroo court where Space Law was not properly upheld. The clear remedy to this problem is to create Judge as a new Job position in Space Station 14 so that upholding Space Law actually is somebody’s Job. D: Structure of Proposal 1: Judge shall be created as a new Job in Space Station 14. Additional Details: This should actually be easy to do. Adding a Judge is far more about updating Space Law, Standard Operating Procedure, Alert Procedure, and Job Descriptions to empower the Job position of Judge with the proper rank and authority to perform the duties of the Judge than it is about modifying game code. The simplest way to go about implementing the Judge game code wise is to just make a duplicate Job position of the Lawyer. Rename the duplicate position “Judge” on the Job listing as well as give the Judge its own PDA and ID Card with access to what the Lawyer has access to. Judge spawns in with Judge Robes on top of standard Lawyer cloths. Judge can even spawn in at Lawyer Spawn Points if Map Makers don’t want to place specific Judge Spawn Points in Court Rooms. Also, obviously, extra Judge Robes should be removed from Vending Machines that they shouldn’t be in. So, for example, no more Judge Robes for Clown. The easiest thing to do would be to put them in Lawyer Vending Machines if Judge isn’t going to get its own Vending Machine. 2: Judge shall have a clear Job Description that lists the Judge as having both the responsibility and the authority over Trying all Trial Cases in Space Law. While the Job of the Lawyer is to argue for the Prosecution or Defense; the Job of the Judge is to Render a Verdict in Accordance with Space Law. 3: Judge shall be high ranking; equal to a Department Head. Additional Details: Judge answers only to Server Admin, Captain, and other Judges. Judge has direct authority over Lawyers. In essence, a single Judge is the ‘Department Head’ over Space Law. Multiple Judges are a shared ‘Department Head’ over Space Law. The Admin owns the Server, and thus has power over the Judge. The Captain, being the Head of the Station, outranks the Judge. A Judge can be found to be in Dereliction of Duty by another Judge. If found to be in Dereliction of Duty; Judge A can strip Judge B of Job position as well as issue other punishments up to and equal to the punishments issued in Judge B’s Mis-Tried Cases. For example, if Judge B is found by Trial under Judge A to have improperly sentenced people to death; Judge A can sentence Judge B to death. Mis-Tried Cases become eligible for Re-Trial. 4: Judge shall have the power to Summon and Subpoena individuals in the service of Trying Cases. Additional Details: Judge is highly advised to take Summoned or Subpoenaed Department Head’s council seriously; similar to how the Captain is highly advised to take Department Head’s council seriously. In this way, Department Heads can still serve the Court when needed in providing Expert Testimony on cases that require it. Security shall be responsible for carrying out the Summons and Subpoenas. Punishments for ignoring the Summons and Subpoenas shall be listed as new Laws for Security to carry out against infringing individuals. There shall be a clear exemption if the Summoned or Subpoenaed individual would do harm to the Station or anybody on the Station by being removed from performing their duties to appear in Court. This way the Judiciary doesn’t cause harm to the Station or anybody on the Station. As an example; if Head of Security leaving to appear in Court would cause the Station to fall apart because the Station is under attack by the Syndicate the Head of Security is able to legally ignore the Summons or Subpoena. Also, if the Station is under a strict enough Emergency Code; Summons and Subpoenas can also be legally ignored as the Station is in a State of Crisis. 5: Selecting Judge from Job Listing shall be restricted to requiring 300 Minutes of playing as Lawyer before Judge becomes eligible for play. This is the same as every Department Head. 6: Judge shall be provided a Bailiff from Security while the Court is in Session; so long as this does not pose undue stress on Security. Additional Details: If there are too few Security Members, this can be ignored and Court can go into Session without a Bailiff. But, ideally, Court should have a Bailiff while in Session so that nobody tries to kill anybody in the Court Room. 7: Judge shall have the authority on deciding if an offense qualifies as a High Crime or a Low Crime. Additional Details: This decision is always to be made in Accordance with Space Law. However, some Laws mirror each other across the two lists and are delineated by severity. In such situations, the Judge has the authority to decide if the offense was severe enough to bump the Case up to a High Crime. This is something of a gray area; and thus this is also something that other Judges can weigh in on if they feel the Judge presiding is not acting in accordance with Space Law. Judge does not have authority to pick and choose what is and is not a High Crime or a Low Crime. Judge has authority on deciding between similar crimes between the two lists if it comes into question. For example, if someone is destroying property; Judge has authority to decide if this is “Damage or Destruction of Property” or “Vandalism.” Essentially, Judge has authority on deciding if this is a case that needs to go to Trial; a High Crime or if this is something that falls in the Jurisdiction of Security; a Low Crime. The accused have right to send their Lawyer to the Judge to make a Determination. Security has the right to go with the Lawyer and represent their views on the matter to the Judge if Security so chooses to do so. Judges are encouraged to not funnel all Cases to themselves and only escalate Cases to Trial when appropriate under Space Law. 8: Martial Law and Court Martial As the Captain of the ship, the Captain does have authority over the Judge. Under Alert Procedure; Captain may at his or her discretion issue Martial Law if the Station is under a severe enough Crisis Code. This will Suspend Court until the crisis is over. Likewise, Captain has authority to issue a Court Martial if he or she sees fit. Captain can then either preside over the Case himself or herself or appoint a relevant Department Head to Preside over the Case. 9: Reappointing Judges If a Judge is found in Dereliction of Duty by another Judge or the Captain the Judge or the Captain making this ruling can strip the Judge of Job position. At this point, it immediately becomes the duty of whoever stripped the Judge of Job position to reappoint a new Judge so that Space Law can continue. 10: Stations should allow 1 Judge for every 2 Lawyers. The amount of Judges and Lawyers should increase for larger Stations. Additional Details: The reason for this is so that there is a Lawyer for Prosecution, a Lawyer for Defense, and a Judge to Render Verdict. So, 1 Judge and 2 Lawyers could make sense for smaller Stations while a larger Station could have 2 Judges and 4 Lawyers or 3 Judges and 6 Lawyers. An increased number of Judges would allow for Judges to hold each other accountable to Space Law as well as allow Judges to more easily swap out with each other between cases so that Judges can eat and drink for a while without having to pause Trying Cases through Court Recess. Judges shall be able to take a 5 Minute Court Recess when needed; especially if there is only one Judge on the Station. E: Conclusion of Proposal Really, the entire idea of this proposal is to make a functioning body of Space Law by making it actually someone in authority’s specific Job to be in charge of Space Law. As Space Law is currently written, it is ineffective because its functioning depends on shattering what should be the job of the Judge into many separate shards and handing them out to the Lawyer, the Department Heads, and the Captain. By taking these pieces of authority and codifying them into the position of Judge; we can take this responsibility off the plates of the Lawyer, the Department Heads, and the Captain (so that they can focus on their actual jobs) and vest this responsibility into a new position tailor made specifically for it. Thus, if it’s someone’s job to sit in the Court Room and Try Cases all Shift; maybe then we can actually have Trials with competent Judges instead of expecting the Captain and Department Heads to leave their actual jobs to ‘play Judge,’ pulling random person out of the hallway to ‘play Judge’ or doing neither and allowing all responsibility to default to Security (as usually happens) thus rendering Space Law largely ineffective. Section D 8 is here to show that the Judge being created as a Job position is not to usurp power from the Captain or Department Heads. Rather, it is because the Captain and Department Heads don’t really have the free time to ‘play Judge’ that Judge should exist as its own Job. Section D 8 exists so that no real power will shift on the Station if Judge is created as a Job position. If Judge does well, Captain and Department Heads are freed of the responsibility. If Judge does poorly, Captain has authority to step in and ‘play Judge’ just like Captain already has now. In essence, Judge exists to Try Cases so that Captain and Department Heads don’t have to. Judge essentially acts as an extension of the Captain’s authority over Space Law without outranking the Captain.

I'm a furry. We're on the same team.

Yes, in this forum people usually ask "How" and "Why" and then I show up and want something from the developers The guys and I were playing something like Survival in the Desert, only the problem is that every new round everything we did disappears. The admin vaguely explained it with the following reasons: Maps with "organics" (that's what he called players for some reason) don't save as they should, or refuse to save in their entirety. And for some reason, I do not remember whether he explained or not, can not make it so that the round is not restarted What do I want? I want to be able to save a map with characters and their items in the inventory. random screenshot from this round btw

Lapse of judgement. Wasn't really thinking at the time, so I just kinda went with it when I really shouldn't have. I also didn't entirely know that IC was also against the rules, either because I skimmed through it or I forgot, but I still had a hutch it would be. I won't make the excuse that I was drunk or anything, just really emptyheaded at the time and in retrospect I both feel and look stupid because of it. I really do like SS14 and would like to get back into it and it'd be a real shame to keep it this way. I hope this clarifies it a bit.

Your ban was placed by the admin team after discussion and an extensive review of evidence of metacommunications and metafriending amongst a large group of players over multiple rounds. Amongst those players were: Mrjoe nhil Skarlet toe_stab Toboyo If it'd be helpful, I can probably get you some IC names of these users. Given this additional context for the ban, are you able to provide any additional information or updates to your appeal, including any information or comments you'd like the admin team to consider while reviewing your appeal?

Hello, Although Nyano is separate from WizDen, they are one of WizDen's partnered servers. As such Wizden's and Nyano's admins share some data about their more "problematic" players. I have already seen people who were banned on WizDen's get automatically banned from Nyano with the reason being in relation to Wizard. I would also like to add that the admins of Nyano definitely talked about your case while it was being handeled on WizDen and slandered you in admin chat which I do not agree on, in terms of transparency or honesty. It also appears you made a well written appeal explaining your POV and you're only recieving a toxic response as well as admins avoiding the real issue of asking about OOC and getting banned for an assumed political opinion. I do not believe you are trans-ist but that you were instead genuilnely worried about the captain breaking other roleplayer's immersion with their political statement. Kindly,